Friday, December 13, 2024

Does This Make You Uncomfortable? - CCR


    The film Does This Make You Uncomfortable? is an op-doc that sociologically examines Generation Z's current feelings toward feet and what that says not just about their generation, but society as a whole (focused on the U.S.). The piece alludes to topics such as conformity, fear of judgment, and self-consciousness, touching on the influence of social media on the generation's hyperawareness of perception. 

    The documentary genre has many subgenres, some including biographical, historical, and episodic. The general consensus of the genre is that, through its conventions, whether it's a ten-minute or 2-hour long film, the piece will focus on a specific part of our existence, illustrating a "snippet of life". Specifically, an op-doc (short for opinion documentary) is a short and opinionated documentary film that allows for the expression of a perspective on a particular topic. Through introductory research in class and the viewings of a range of documentaries, a more accurately representative understanding of the genre was formed that paved the way for all production choices, strongly informing the narrative structure of the documentary.
    
    The research conducted to enter the world of documentaries was instrumental in understanding the versatile and personalized nature of the genre, further discussed in this blog, which describes the research process for creating the op-doc, with each documentary viewing giving insight into the myriad of ways to approach exploring the "snippet of life". The introduction of the New York Times op-doc I Think This Is the Closest to How the Footage Looked, being the first impression of what an op-doc was, was striking in its form of storytelling about such a universal yet isolating experience (grief), and dismantled preconceived ideas of what a documentary was limited to being: a straightforward and explicit showcase of a particular subject. The viewing of other NYT op-docs such as A New Wave also broke through this mold, reinforcing its themes through unique visual choices that strongly engage its viewers, expanding previous expectations regarding the cinematography of a documentary.

    The attentive viewing and interaction with the documentary American Promise, by creators Joe Brewster and Michele Stephenson, introduced an explicitly personal approach and served as a gateway, along with Banksy's documentary Exit Through the Gift Shop, into the different relationships the creators can have with their audience, with the chosen approach influencing the audience's connection to the messages the creators are trying to get across. This documentary also showcased that there are different ways to communicate the theme to the viewer (in this case implicitly, with production choices hinting at the larger theme being conveyed). This doc illustrated the extent to which one could allude to a bigger idea through choices such as title name and narrative development, both leading the audience closer to the bigger picture. Other pieces like Netflix's docu-series Abstract: The Art of Design, specifically S2 Ep 3 (Ruth Carter: Costume Design) expanded the range of expectations in terms of editing, still keeping a personal feel yet balancing it with large-scale production. The way all choices continuously engaged the audience and committed to showcasing the artistic process was eye-opening. All of the pieces viewed and studied truly broke previous expectations set for the genre and created space for experimentation and creative decisions taken in the documentary, Does This Make You Uncomfortable?

    The documentary follows typical conventions of a documentary, basing the development of the narrative on interviews, lasting 13-minutes (shorter than full-length film), and creating a sense of realism through hand-held shots. While these are just some, the doc does implement some specific choices that aren't seen in all documentaries, largely inspired by docs researched such as Exit Through the Gift Shop. The nature of the topic and point of the documentary, being more investigative than conclusive as Gen Z teenagers try to understand and highlight their own generation's feelings about feet, made the ending of the documentary diverge from a defined POV, with interviewees giving their own insight. While the ending could've been better developed to leave the audience to question the topic being discussed, it differs from a typical documentary as the current reaction of feet in Gen Z is "undiagnosed", as there is no ONE specific reason for it. Furthermore, the implementation of interviews by the directors of the piece was also inspired by Banksy's documentary, needed as a transitional device between interviews to progress the doc.

    The reasoning for all of these choices was ultimately to attempt to represent the different generational groups in an accurate way, specifically regarding their relationship to feet. The piece represents Gen Z as uncomfortable with feet, emphasized through interview clips where two people wouldn't hold a paper of feet, along with further reactions that reinforced the reaction. They are also represented as slightly dramatic in their reactions, with the contrast to other generational responses developing this. The older generations are represented as detached from the feelings shared by the Gen Z group. These representations lead to a bigger saying about the different generations, commenting on Gen Z's hyperawareness of appearance and perception as compared to the older generations. These representations also leave room for the questioning of situational differences between the generations, such as the development of social media. In addition to representing social groups, the documentary represents social issues such as Generation Z's social and personal insecurity. Displayed through the main interviews toward the end of the doc, Gen Z has a tendency to coverup more, shown through celebrities like Billie Eilish. Unrealistic expectations on appearance developed through social media were discussed as well, alluding to the layers of awareness that the generation feels responsible for in this modern-age, relating back to the more entertaining topic of feet, attracting the target audience toward a larger conversation.

    These representations are essential to the audience's perception and consideration of the topic. The target audience of the documentary is people from Generation Z (people born from 1997 to 2012) of any gender. Gen Zers who would be interested in the doc include those who take the topic as a joke, as the documentary begins with a comedic tone and fast-paced editing, and considers the topic in a more unserious way. The specific editing style, including the use of instrumental music, is done to engage the Gen Z audience (who would probably consider the topic in an unserious way) and ultimately lead them to the bigger picture connections at the end of the documentary (being the POINT of the doc). Additionally, the documentary might get a stronger reaction from the Gen Zers on social media, which would most-likely be all of them, as it might be a root of the modern-day feelings of disgust with feet.

    The documentary Does This Make You Uncomfortable? develops a comedic tone before shifting to a more thoughtful and reflective one through specific editing techniques, with all production choices attempting to attract the target audience toward a relevant conversation regarding not just Generation Z, but society as a whole about topics such as conformity and the effects of social norms on a group of people.

Wednesday, December 11, 2024

Does This Make You Uncomfortable? - Editing

     This stage of the process was the most all over the place but also the most fulfilling in the end. We had agreed that Zach and I would edit the op-doc as he has had experience in his CBTV class and I genuinely love to edit and could go on talking about why, which I have done in my "Beginning the Editing Process" blog post, so feel free to check it out :)

    After we finished all of our interviews and still had b-roll to shoot (which we never ended up shooting...), it was coming close to the due date and we needed to put all of the puzzle pieces together. The two major parts we needed to edit were the two dividing parts of the doc, with the first half introducing the topic in a comedic and relatable light and the second half shifting in tone and becoming more thoughtful and insightful towards the topic, maintaining some moments of comedy yet not emphasized by music and other more enhancive editing choices to bring the topic back down to "reality" and make some real-life applications that could explain the shared reactions observed by Generation Z and make bigger picture connections/commentary.

    I edited the first half of the doc, which included the introduction and MOTS, and Zach edited the main interviews together which made up the second half of the doc. Here are some key elements and factors that were important during the editing process:


                           Narrative Structure


    As I have talked about in the past two blog posts regarding the Does This Make You Uncomfortable? documentary, the approach and narrative structure of our piece are a big decider in how the audience would receive any message, especially when trying to get Gen Z teenagers to seriously consider the relevance of their "silly" opinions on feet and what that could say about them and a large majority of their generation (in the U.S.). The lack of clarity in the planning stage as to our layout for where we wanted to insert our own interviews/ what we would say in them made it so that it all had to be figured out during the editing stage, which made me take even longer than I usually do as a perfectionist! We ended up wanting to take inspiration from Banksy's narrative structure in Exit Through the Gift Shop, inserting our own director interviews at the beginning of the doc and in some places during the MOTS to make conclusions and state surprising observations about the interviews, serving as transitions between points we wanted to make. Looking back, I even replicated the J-cut that happens at the beginning of Banksy's doc, as we are also setting up for an interview immediately into the doc, creating a more personal feel.

    
Exit Through the Gift Shop (Banksy 1st appearance, 2:30)


Does This Make You Uncomfortable? (Beginning)



Music


    Music sets the tone for any production, playing an instrumental role in influencing the mood of the audience. As soon as I had pieced the opening sequence together, I knew that I wanted to add funky, possibly jazzy, instrumental music with beats to shape the editing and frame the upcoming sequence. Zach had mentioned having a song from Whiplash or a percussion-based piece after the title shot, so it helped inspire me to begin the music there. I also knew that to make the MOTS interviews more entertaining, adding music would not only engage the audience but also develop an investigative/ fun feel that emotes the process that we were going through when asking the interviewees these questions and making connections on our own.

    When choosing the songs to include specifically, I looked through some of my liked songs on Spotify as I have a collection of instrumental pieces that I thought could fit the vibe I was going for for each different part of the MOTS section of the doc. For the quick montage right after the title shot, I knew I wanted something more upbeat and fast-paced to hook the audience after a slower beginning.  I ended up choosing "Mambo No.5" by Perez Prado as it introduces the subject spontaneously. Then, to lead into the longer interviews, I check out one of my go-to instrumental albums by Piero Piccioni titled "Camille 2000".


Montage of MOTS



    I wanted instrumentals that wouldn't take too much attention but still make an impact, helping the flow of the MOTS to also keep the viewer engaged. For the Gen Z MOTS I used the song "Slow Flute Beat" and for the non-Gen Zers (older generations) I used "Chains of Love" from the same album. I ended up choosing those for their respective parts because I thought they complemented the part of the narrative that was being developed when they were both playing, as the music made space for the audience to consider the points being made in whatever tone was being developed by the music. The lack of music in specific parts was done to bring the viewer back to the bigger picture, and while it could be taken as intense, the continuity in not-knowing-what comes next with the editing for the entire first half of the doc hopefully put the viewer on a ride which would soon dial down in the second half.



                                CapCut


    I edited my whole sequence on CapCut for multiple reasons:

  • It was the most easily accessible for me as I always have my phone (I edited on my phone) and could do it anywhere I went at any time I wanted.
  • It's an application I'm used to, whereas with Adobe Premiere I would have to reaccustom myself to the application and I didn't have the time for that!!!
  • I had tools such as overlay and different fonts that I didn't have on iMovie.
    
    Editing on CapCut didn't give me any issues, allowing me to use overlays for the title shot of my foot (yes its my foot) against a white background paused with the title of the documentary.



Title shot

    

                               Struggles


    Along the way, I definitely encountered some struggles...
  1. Audio: For the MOTS, the mic and camera had a disconnect (I think it was not plugged in properly) and we lost almost all of the audio from the mic. This was TERRIFYING considering I thought we had to reshoot everything. Luckily, we had the idea to bring Dani's camcorder-like camera so we used the audio on that one and, with Zach's CBTV skills, he enhanced the audio to the best of its ability. With adding some captions (I should've added more), what the interviewees were saying wasn't too blurry, yet definitely not perfect.
  2. Time (what a surprise!)
  3. Beginning: For the beginning of the doc, I had no idea what to do. I was stuck as I felt overwhelmed with all of the content we had filmed and didn't even know where to start. I got over this bump by writing everything I wanted to prioritize on a notes page on the Notes app on my phone, as I felt like I had a lot I wanted to get across at the beginning but hadn't put it into words/ organized it. This allowed me to get a hold on the approach for the beginning, as I put myself in the place of the viewer and thought about what I wanted to make them feel. I also reminded myself of what I said in the first blog post of this series: There's no right way! There are so many ways to get develop the narrative we wanted, so I let myself experiment.

Screen-recording of one of Note pages (ME TRYING TO PROCESS MY THOUGHTS)


                             Reflections


    After I finished my editing part, I put together what Zach had edited to make what is the current final product. Here is a link to our op-doc, Does This Make You Uncomfortable?

    This process was exhilarating and fulfilling. In the 2-week span we had to research, plan, film, and edit our 13-minute documentary, I reconnected to a fun style of editing that I hadn't exercised in a while, and dived into a topic with 2 friends of mine that genuinely interested me (NOT FEET, BUT THE SOCIOLOGICAL PART OKAY.) While there is definitely more we could've done and things we could change, I am really proud of how it ended up and even prouder of how I know we are going to maximize its potential in the near future. 

    This has been one of my favorite projects I've gotten to do in all of AICE Media Studies, and am excited to watch more documentaries as it has become one of my favorite genres of film. If our doc gets accepted into any places we submit it to, the whole class will show up in flip flops its been established. (Also we contacted the Baha Men band's agency and team to use the song "Who Let the Dogs Out?" for our ending credit scene and we got past one person, meaning we got a response. That was a highlight for sure.)

Tuesday, December 10, 2024

Does This Make You Uncomfortable? - Production

    Now it was time to enter the world of foot opinions and instigate a range of reactions from people out in the real world, the part of the process that most excited us. Our filming dealt with four major parts:

  1. Main interviews: longer, more focused interviews that would take up around the second half of the doc ( interviewees included on specific interviewee list)
  2. MOTS ("Man on the Street style interviews; interviewees spontaneously chosen gave informed consent)
  3. Creator interviews
  4. B-roll
    We already had our questions ready for #1 and #2, and some responses from our interviewee list, so we decided to get started as quickly as possible, as we needed the interviews to get any b-roll we needed.



#1- Main Interviews


    We began by filming the interviews that were supposed to move the conversation of feet from mainly comedic to more thoughtful and meaningful. Below is a list of the interviewees that we ended up interviewing:



    We brought the same tools for each interview, including filming equipment (a camera and a mic) that Zach obtained through CBTV and of his own, as well as the picture that we would be referencing when beginning each interview with "Does this make you uncomfortable?", referring to the name of the documentary. We started with Mr. Berna's interview, and it was one of my favorites of the whole interview experience. He was receptive and dived into realms of the topic with passion such as his observations on self-consciousness affecting people not just having to do with when feet are exposed in unconventional contexts, but the reasoning for the use of oversized clothing in Gen Z, or the reason why teens in his local environment where hoodies when it's close to 100 degrees outside. He gave us connections that we hadn't even thought of yet, all while also giving us really funny content to use that would develop an array of interviewee "personalities", also drawing in the viewer.


One of our favorite moments from his interview


    We proceeded to film the rest of the main interviews over the span of the next week and a half, with multiple perspectives on the topic. The two teachers we interviewed definitely had more to say about the societal implications of the specific reaction that they have noticed/ are now aware of regarding Gen Z and feet, with Mr. Berna stating to have noticed it previously and Mr. Cano seemed to be just becoming aware of it, making conclusions based on other similar discomforts he's noticed in the generation:




    The process of filming took about 10-20 minutes per interview, depending on who was being interviewed. While Andrea's took about 10, being that she had less to say about the topic, Mr. Berna's took around 18 minutes, as he remarked on personal anecdotes and made further connections. 



                               #2- MOTS


    These style of interviews took one day to shoot, including us going to a commonplace in our city known as Town Center and asking strangers these questions:
  • Does this (picture of feet below) make you uncomfortable?
  • Do you have any specific opinions/ feelings towards feet?


The piece of paper we showed all of our interviewees of feet

    We used a two cameras this time- a modern and more "camcorder feel" camera to create a range of shots and textures in the visuals to engage the audience, as well as a different mic that would serve the style of MOTS and allow us to easily get better audio rather than mic people up which would take too long and even turn away some of our potential interviewees. We were in between Town Center and a local mall but ended up choosing the center because of the mixed age groups that we have each seen there, as well as that it was a more easily accessible place to all of us. 


Handheld mic and camera (camcorder-like camera not shown)


    Being the one that was asking the questions, I felt it was really important to constantly try to stay focused on the bigger picture during the interviews and meet the interviewees where they were at in terms of comfortability with the topic and being interviewed in a public place, as well as confusion on the topic in general (as in why were we asking them about feet). I made sure to start by quickly explaining what grade we were all in (as Zach and Dani were filming on two separate cameras) and what we were doing, saying something along the lines of "We are doing sociological study and wanted to see if you would be open to answering a few questions", also stating that it would take a maximum of 5 minutes. 

    The interviews included an array of responses, especially between the generations. We got further insight into people's different connections to feet, specifically adults who have a connection to dance. It informed us on the different relationships people can have with feet, specifically opening our eyes to Generation Z's attention to appearance as they all were focused on how a foot looks, smells, etc... Below are two clips from our MOTS interviews:


An older couple's "stance" on feet

Gen Zers joking about having a foot fetish

  


                        #3- Creator Interviews


    At the beginning of the brainstorming process, we didn't know that we were going to include ourselves in the narration of the documentary, with the idea forming later on as we began to ground our approach and realize we needed a reliable voice to move the narrative along in a clear way to best serve the other interviews. We decided to film ourselves slightly last minute to piece the "puzzle pieces" that were the main interviews and MOTS together. We used the same filming equipment that we had used for the main interviews plus a different camera that is my sister's, a Sony ZV-E10, as I filmed my own interviews by myself at my house due to a lack of time to do it together. It didn't make too much of a difference as I asked myself the questions and pretended someone was there!!!

    Dani's interview was filmed before school, giving insight into her opinion on the topic. While the full interview was about 4 and a half minutes long, post-production molded each of our interviews to better serve the flow of the narrative, which I will talk more about in the next blog. Zach recorded on his iPhone so I didn't include his clip during editing, which we will be reshooting as we continue to clean up the op-doc till it's finished.


Raw footage of Dani's interview


Raw footage of my interview



#4 - B-roll


    This is the part of the filming that we definitely lacked in. Since we were racing against time and focusing on finishing the interviews, we didn't prioritize making time to brainstorm and produce b-roll to support our interviews. B-roll ideas that I had come up with included showing different types of shoes, which I demonstrated a draft of in the blog post "Does This Make You Uncomfortable? - Research", where we could introduce the aspect of acceptance of feet being exposed in specific contexts, being a reason why people feel disturbed by feet out in a classroom for example. A consistent and stylized form of b-roll to demonstrate items that some of the interviewees referenced such as Mr. Berna referencing Billie Eilish wearing oversized clothing, that wasn't included in the current version of the doc, or Mr. Canno's interview referring to "bandages" (pimple patches) that teens wear nowadays could be good options, but ones that we didn't implement into our doc. 


A still shot of a draft of possible b-roll (pimple patch box)


    Also, we could've implemented b-roll of people looking at others and being aware of others' perceptions of them or them on social media. Whether or not it would have to be staged, it would help develop the bigger picture and make the points the interviewees are saying regarding everyday awareness of perception feel more relatable to the Gen Z audience/ look more familiar.


Reflections


    Stage 3 of our op-doc was the most fun and eventful, with the interviewee reactions to our questions giving us close-up reactions and insight into the topics we had researched, including control over external perception, self-consciousness, and conformity, both implicitly through seemingly just funny moments and sometimes explicitly through interviewed who has more to say about the topic.

    In the moment it felt like having a scattered array of puzzle pieces that we had to fit together to develop a much larger conversation, and in retrospect, they would fit together (in post-production)! As someone who needs to see the bigger picture to feel like I can confidently approach a project, it was at times challenging to dive in without a clear outline of what would occur being that our interviews guided many of our choices. This stage taught me that it's key to be as focused on the bigger picture throughout filming as possible, or else it will all fall on the editing stage which isn't bad but can feel overwhelming when having so much footage and such little time. Additionally, having a stronger idea of our narrative structure (planning stage) would help this part, as it would've aided in knowing what we needed from our own creator interviews. We also didn't develop a specific script for the creator interviews and that had repercussions in the post-production process.

Sunday, December 8, 2024

Does This Make You Uncomfortable? - Research and Planning

     On the first day of discussing documentaries, specifically viewing the doc previously discussed, I Think This Is the Closest to How the Footage Looked, my teacher brought up a question to the class, "How do you guys feel about feet?". This started a slight outburst of energized disgust from the class, which I expected. I personally have thought about this topic before and have a good amount of opinions on it, specifically speculations on why a sense of genuine discomfort is now maximized by the exposure of feet, as well as about how much it slightly saddens me that it's happening. While that may sound strange, it's true. After my future partner for the project, Zach jokingly brought up the idea "We should do a documentary on feet", I proceeded to write ideas on my paper for a possible future documentary...

    After taking notes on "Documentary Production Tips/ Techniques" in class and diving into the requirements for the project, we began to brainstorm documentary topics and form into groups. Sticking to my word and genuinely wanting to have an excuse to indulge in the concepts that came with exploring Generation Z's relationship to feet/ their feelings towards them, I initially wanted to work alone. As a control freak and having such a specific focus in mind of approaching the topic with depth not just as a joke/ in a surface-level way that seems to cover the truth behind the reactions that occurred in class, I ended up changing my mind as we had about 2 weeks to research, plan, film, and edit the op-doc, and because I knew that the two people interested in joining my group, Dani and Zach, would be intentional, dedicated, and also just make the 2-week process fun.


Tips & Techniques





                        Brainstorming Approach


    We immediately began to brainstorm ideas on our approach, which would largely define how the audience approaches the concept of feet and the possible ideas we were going to be bringing up through our interviews. This was the hardest part, along with b-roll during production, as there isn't a specific layout for this, or any topic. As stated in my last blog post, we had to figure out WHAT we wanted to say/ WHY we were all going to be showcasing this "snippet of life", as well as HOW we were going to translate that purpose in our approach. A LOT TO THINK ABOUT! 

    Some immediate things we landed on were that we wanted to develop a comedic tone to allow the audience to get comfortable with the topic, as that would build their openness to considering our future observations, founded on research and our own "research" interviewing a range of people on the topic. While it took a while for our approach to be tightly secured, we ended up taking inspiration from Banksy's Exit Through the Gift Shop documentary and almost "splitting doc in half". As his production shifts in "narrator" and begins to steer the audience's perception of the main subject of the doc, I really wanted to create a shift in our production of "funny" with consideration of the responses happening to more "thoughtful" with more grounded and focused interviews. Being that we wanted to dive into Generation Z specifically when viewing their reactions to feet and what it alludes to about their generation, we knew that we wanted to consider other generations in the conversation to have a source of comparison and bring this "issue", or observation of reactions, to light, which we hoped we would get in our interviews.



                               Planning


    In the midst of brainstorming, we began to plan. We did a pre-documentary planning assignment that allowed us to organize ourselves including our title that Zach brilliantly came up with, possible shot-types, and more. It is linked below:


    We also created a separate document for our structure/ outline that ended up becoming our hub for ideas, critiques, and research. This document holds our interview questions as well, a key part of not just how to approach our own topic, but for any documentary. Our "unofficial planning documentary" is linked below:



    Our planning consisted of us trying to fully understand our approach and go from there, with our filming schedule looking like this:
  • Asking our wanted interviewees if they would be available to film at any point in the week
  • Setting up interviews and securing time slots for those who agreed
  • Filming those interviews (serve as a more focused and personal outlook on the topic for the audience)
  • Filming "Man On the Street" style interviews
  • Filming our own interviews (that idea came later in the process)
  • Getting b-roll after our interviews

    Our topic needed a comparison of different generation's reactions to feet, so brainstorming our interviewees began with wanting to interview people of different ages who could have different relationships to feet (ex: In terms of occupation- a doctor, a pedicurist, etc...). Once we talked to our teacher about these examples of possible interviewees, with each group member searching for connections for people with these specific jobs, we settled on focusing on age. 

    Regarding interview questions, we came up with a set specific questions that allowed for internal and external reflection on the current day reactions to feet, using them as a base with our interviewees but also allowing for any follow-up questions to their responses. For the MOTS as we would call them (interviews filmed on the street), we asked our interviewees the first and third question from the list below, being that we didn't want to stop them for too long and weren't depending on those interviews to get more thoughtful, rather as an entertaining beginning to our doc. Below is our draft of interview questions (we changed up the wording a little bit when asking our interviewees these questions, but stuck to the same idea):






First-day ideas



Notes on us playing with and securing our outline




A reframing of specifics to include after filming some interviews



                              Research


    The research is linked above in the "unofficial planning documentary", including links to websites that we thought had relevant information regarding observations and even lack of conclusive "answer" as to why so much of Gen Z (studying about Gen Z in U.S.) could/ does have a more amplified reaction to feet as compared to other generations. We thought it was important to investigate the prior reasons for discomfort with feet, such as the idea of a foot fetish/ the sexualization of feet. We researched the relationship between the discomfort of feet with Gen Z's current-conforming state, and how being on social media is a huge contributor and influencer of their opinions and awareness of perception. This all developed my want to hear from the interviewees and put these ideas of extreme awareness/conformity to avoid judgment and fear of being judged to the test, as it's something I have seen in my day-to-day life.
    
    In addition to research on the topic, we were still trying to put a finger on what approach we wanted to take so we looked into some documentaries, with A Vulnerable Conversation About Attractiveness, a docu-series on Tejas Hullur's YouTube channel coming up on my homepage, and opening my eyes to a type of way that we could possibly insert ourselves into the narration (also inspired by Exit Through the Gift Shop) to better clearly communicate and drive the concepts forward to get to a purposeful place in the end.


                             Reflections


    This part of the process was essential in grounding our similar ideas, as well as bridging our ideas and actions. This part was also probably the hardest, as trying to set a distinctive plan meant we had to get to the core of what we were trying to "shed light" on ABOUT the Gen Zers reactions to feet, and be extremely focused on the bigger picture while filming, editing, etc... It took us a while to get to the final product in terms of approach, with it honestly falling fully into place during editing.

    I now know that having a clear path (that can end up changing during the production process) from the start aids in making decisions about what to film, so the more planning we can do beforehand the better, as we don't want the story to take a life of its own. While it wasn't an extreme issue in the final product, it's a takeaway for future projects as it made me feel stuck at the beginning, being that we didn't have a quickly established group outlook on how our choices were contributing to what we wanted to leave the audience with in the end.

Saturday, December 7, 2024

Does This Make You Uncomfortable? - Research

    For our third larger-scale project of the year, we were asked to produce a short op-doc (short for opinion documentary), or a short and opinionated documentary film that allows for the expression of a perspective on a particular topic, that strives to capture a "snippet" of life. 

    With that being said, I'm excited to share with you the process of creating:


                                                     Does This Make You Uncomfortable?

    An op-doc exploring different generations' current reactions to feet, specifically focusing on Generation Z, and what their opinions allude to about the generation, further exploring the developmental process and impact of social norms on a group of people. (Focused on the U.S.)


                          I was uneducated


    My view of what a documentary was before this project was very limited and one-dimensional, as I assumed all documentaries had a similar feel: straightforward and observational. While the purpose of a documentary doesn't necessarily negate those preconceived ideas, the research I did in and out of class through watching a range of documentaries that serve the same purpose (capture a "snippet of life"), yet took almost completely different stylistic approaches to serve the perspective being expressed deeply inspired me. 

    It opened my eyes to the endless possibilities that come with this genre, as well as the type of person that it takes to capture this "snippet of life" as focused and sincerely as possible, with traits including quick thinking/ adaptability, attentivity (good listener), and ability to focus on the bigger picture being some. These are all traits that I resonate with, so not only did the research get me excited for my own production but it also excited me that the characteristics that make up my existence concerning everything I do/am involved with (my relationships, school work, my artistic pursuits...) are the core to telling this type of story, personalizing the genre of film for me. Overall, the central focus of telling a personal and raw part of our existence and how all production choices hone in on that and embrace it in personalized ways really drew me in and intrigued me regarding my own project.



                 Exploring all facets of the genre


    The first documentary we watched in class was I Think This Is the Closest to How the Footage Looked, a 10-minute Israeli New York Times op-doc by Yuval Hameiri. It is an implicit showcase of grief, with a unique form of storytelling to tell the story of a grieving son who accidentally rewinds film tape and erases footage of his mother before her death, using household items to recount past events and desperately trying to recreate the lost footage. It was heartbreaking once I realized what it all meant, especially because of the way they told the story, a key lesson that I learned while researching this genre. 

    The inclusion of the rewinding of film tape to the few seconds he had left of his mother is shattering, even more, due to the quiet atmosphere created that holds so much emotion. This is in the top 2/3 favorites, if not my favorite documentary I watched for research, specifically because it immediately dismantled the mold that I previously thought that docs had to fit into, ultimately allowing me to experiment in the way my group and I would approach our topic and also had some effects in editing such as the film/ tape sound in the title shot.


Tape rewinding, 7:00 (NYT op-doc)



Does This Make You Uncomfortable, 1:10


    Additionally, I had thought of a more creative type of b-roll for the doc as that was one of if not the most challenging part of our project (which you will hear more about in the later blog posts), taking inspiration from the stylistic look of the beginning of the NYT op-doc, which didn't end up in our final product but we might want to implement as we continue to work on it in the future...


NYT Op-doc, 0:20


(Raw, unedited footage)


    While that first documentary really shaped my approach for the rest of the process, they all had such a strong impact on my approach, as analyzing production choices led me to want to embrace the endless avenues I could take for my own production. 

    The documentary American Promise showed me the dedication on the creator's side to capture the "snippet of life" that they're trying to get across, setting up standards for how detail-oriented and intentional I wanted to be with my own ventured topic, as well as having a true purpose of exploring the topic. It also opened my eyes to the different ways you can get personal with a documentary, as with other productions such as the Netflix episodic documentary Abstract: The Art of Design, the production scale is much larger, yet still remains personal to the subject through its own creative choices of b-roll. 
This documentary surprised me in its range of b-roll types to keep the viewers engaged, as well as how every single production choice brought the viewer into the specific world of the subject, being that the series dives into different art forms. 

    This production along with New York Times', A New Wave op-doc, allowed me to extend my range in visual expectations of a documentary and showed me that you can tell a personal story while simultaneously having a cinematic feel to your production. Lastly, the documentary Exit Through the Gift Shop probably had the most influence on our final product. While I will get more into production choices in later blogs, the structure and development of narration in this production intrigued me. Its implicit nature towards a bigger concept/ topic slightly reminded me of the first doc I had watched, and I felt deeply that I wanted to obtain that same feeling of developing an idea and leaving it in the hands of the viewer to make something out of it. Before I forget, BANKSY IS A GENIUS.


American Promise, 2013

Exit Through the Gift Shop, 2010

Abstract: The Art of Design, 2017

A New Wave, 2024




                               Reflections


    This first stage of the process where I was awakened to the world of documentaries, as you can tell by how much I have written, was not only obviously the basis for the choices I made for the rest of the process but also genuinely intrigued and tugged on a part of me that I didn't expect it to. I would've never guessed that the genre would be so versatile yet have such a profound core in all of its productions. 

    I think I got so much out of this stage because I was very intentional and involved in the viewings of the docs, taking chronological notes throughout the whole film on production choices and their effects on my perception of the "snippet of life" being focused on.



Some American Promise doc notes


American Promise BTS talk notes





Some Exit Through the Gift Shop notes



Some Abstract: The Art of Design notes



    Overall, I learned a lot during this stage and took a lot of lessons for my production such as...

  • It's not only about what you want to say, but HOW you say it, as every choice will ultimately affect how the audiences perceive and receive what you want to say in the first place. 
  • Because all production choices have such a decisive effect on the audience's relationship to what you want to say, it's EXTREMELY important to always be putting yourself in the place of the viewer and consider how the choices you're making tie into your purpose.
  • To be attentive during interviews!!! Make subjects comfortable (especially with my chosen topic).

Friday, December 6, 2024

We're Back.

          HELLO BLOG!!! IT'S ME, VICS, THE ONE WHO THINKS!!! ;) 

    (I hope you're not cringing too hard at the reference to my blog name... If so I'm happy to have ignited such a strong feeling so quickly upon my return!) 

    It's been a while since my last post, which was part of my AS Level Exam submission. While that now feels like a while ago, I'm excited for this new chapter in my AICE Media Studies journey! I am curious to see what route I will choose to take with my portfolio project and excited about what new things I will learn about regarding all stages of production.

    There's still some time to go before then, so for now I'm happy to be back and wanted to reintroduce myself in this transitional part of my AICE Media Studies journey!

Tuesday, April 2, 2024